Tom talks about direct dictionary editing
I have also seen posts on newsgroups from time to time that suggest updating the dictionary directly. This is a bad idea. But the reason I was interested in Tom's post is that I have seen it done but for nefarious reasons not just because of trying to get around the lack of a feature. I know that Alex Kornbrusts Company has released a tool (repscan) that detects just this kind of activity, i.e. direct editing of the data dictionary. If you cannot guarantee the integrity of the data dictionary then you are in trouble.